|
Hoplophobia- Colonel Jeff Cooper
attributed this behavior to an irrational fear of
firearms and other forms of weaponry. He stated that
"the most common manifestation of hoplophobia is the
idea that instruments possess a will of their own, apart
from that of their user."
hoplophilia-an affection towards guns
Why Do We Train?
by Eric Dean Threat Solutions LLC
This question is generally asked, perhaps not so direct
but always lingers out there when the topic of gun
training is brought up. Firearms training is also
(strangely to me) is sometimes met with a fair bit of
hostility and a dash of ego. Now I am by no means making
an assumption that I am the end all spot for firearms
training, and it is my utmost desire not to ever assume
that I am a "blowhard". I think after a few years in the
field I have at least "gotten IT". Now of course the
next logical question is, "what is "it"?. It is making
the leap of faith that understanding the importance of
the 4-safety rules of firearms safety is inherently the
most important aspect of any training atmosphere. If you
do not know what the 4-safety rules of firearms safety
are please do a quick Google search for it and than come
back and read the rest. (Use Jeff Cooper for the assist
if you go look). There is no training out there that
will be of any value to anyone if these rules are not
part of any training curriculum.
Why do some people feel it necessary to point a firearm
at you at say the gun show or gun shop and when you ask
them to politely stop doing that, a response that is
more prevalent than one would be comfortable with is
"Oh, its not loaded"? I wonder how many people out there
have been shot with an "unloaded" gun. Rarely are there
"accidents" when handling firearms, generally it is
negligence on 90% the holder and 10% on the person its
pointing at. If you understand the 4-safety rules, you
should always be the 10% and always be very loud when
correcting the 90%. Be the 10%. There is actually a 5th
rule of gun safety out there that I have come up with
and it is this, "Rule 5- Do not point your gun at me and
I will not point my gun at you.". Use this rule at your
discretion.
Why do we attend firearms training? Well I think that
it is the same reason that we take piano lessons; we
want to learn how to play the darn thing. Seems
pointless to spend big bucks on a new toy and then not
know how to make it work up to what it was designed to
do. As with any mechanical device there are many aspects
of it that must be learned, and generally those things
must be taught by a competent individual. To steal a
line from a recent movie, "How do you get to Carnegie
Hall? You practice". Now Carnegie Hall may be a time
that the entire show is on the line. Like, oh an
altercation for your life. That is the big night at the
show, its the Super bowl, its whatever that magical
moment is that you have trained all your life for, and
now its show time. For me, I assume that anyone that
would accept the responsibility for owning and carrying
a firearm in which may actually put you into a position
that there may be a fight for your life, you would want
to be on top of your game. Lets face it, we are not
shooting free throws here, we are fighting for our
LIVES! We are people who have realized that it is a
dangerous world that we live in and we want to make that
extra step to be prepared for that moment that we may
(hopefully never) need to protect ourselves.
If you have a desire to go and get some training with
your firearm, ask some questions of them. Ask them about
how many rounds are in the class. If there is 1000
rounds in a day, that may be a bit much, somewhere from
a hundred or so for an entry level course (which is
always a good course for the new guy or gal or for a
super refresher to get the basics back down) up to as
many as 300+ for a more advanced day. Another question
to ask is the curriculum of the course. Is there
practice without the use of ammunition prior to new
drills being covered. Is there going to be some type of
handout that I can take home and work with and use to
practice at home and at the range. (I'll let you make
the decision of what type of training should be done at
home and what type should be done on the range). How
practical or real life relevant is the training? Is it a
"hot" range compared to a "cold" range. Hot range and
cold range is if the gun is loaded while not actually on
the line firing, or do I have to clear my gun, open the
slide and re-holster when going to the break room or
whatever. Hot ranges are important. Hot ranges get you
use to carrying a firearm that will kill you or someone
else if you mess up, where as getting into a mindset
that, "ah its not loaded it cannot hurt anything now."
As you read on your google search, Rule #1 is quite
clear about all guns are always loaded. If rule 1 says
its already loaded, what's the point of walking around
with it dry? Hot ranges are proven to be safer. Get some
back ground on the instructors. Generally some real
world experience in Law Enforcement, military or some
other type of gun toting profession is a plus but not
always mandatory to have a competent instructor. Also
ask around, see how others have experienced when they
attended. If the company meets all these criteria it may
be worth the money.
We train to become competent with our firearms. When we
use a firearm, imagine how your going to feel. If you
think that your going to be like a frozen pickle (cool
as a cucumber) than your a better person than I. Use a
training program that fits you and it is always relevant
to what your needs are.
Eric Dean
"Practice does not make perfect; but instead a good
practitioner. Only perfect practice makes perfect."
Leave
your comments and thoughts here.
News |
|

As reported, one violent robber was
fatally shot after he and three accomplices
attempted to rob an East St. Louis, IL
convenience store.
Police say that four armed robbers
forced their way in through the locked front
door of the Quality Market at about 3:00
AM. The robbers are said to have rushed
toward the 21 year old clerk, who grabbed
his self defense pistol. The robbers
reportedly attacked the clerk, at which
point one of the robbers was shot in the
chest. The uninjured robbers grabbed their
injured accomplice and fled, according to
police. The injured robber reportedly died
of his wounds at a nearby hospital, and two
suspects who accompanied him to the hospital
were arrested.
Once again, gun ownership has allowed a
law abiding citizen to defend themselves
from multiple violent criminals. Had this
store clerk not had a gun, the robbers may
very well have
harmed him for not having enough money,
or perhaps
just for the fun of it. Make no mistake
about it –
robbery is a violent crime against the
victim’s person, and a deadly threat to
their life. This is all the more true when,
as here, a single victim is confronted by
multiple attackers
Leave your comments and thoughts here.
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A masked and armed
intruder was fatally shot in self
defense by the owner of a Cartersville,
KY home.
As reported , 40 year old Dallas Helton,
of Paint Lick, KY, was allegedly wearing
a ski mask and gloves, while carrying a
crow bar, as he broke in to a
Cartersville, KY home. The owner of the
rural home fired one shot in self
defense, saving himself from violent
attack, and fatally wounding the
invader.
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-------------
from wlex18.com
Police are investigating
after they say a man was shot to death early
Tuesday morning while trying to break into a
home in Garrard County.
The incident happened at
about 12:45 a.m. at a home on Old Richmond
Road. Kentucky State Police said Dallas
Richard Helton, 40, had broken into the back
of the home, and was shot once in the chest
by the homeowner, Herlin McQuerry, 67.
Helton stumbled out to the driveway where
police said he died.
Police said McQuerry also
fired a shot at the alleged getaway car
being driven by Tonya Fowler, 35, of Berea.
She was later arrested and charged with
complicity to commit burglary second degree.
Helton's 17-year-old son was
also in the vehicle. Police questioned him,
but have not charged him.
Helton's family claims they
were looking at rental property. However,
Kentucky State Police said Helton was
wearing a black ski mask and armed with a
crowbar. Police added McQuerry's house was
not listed for rent.
No charges will be filed
against McQuerry in the case.
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Associated
Press
LUFKIN, Texas -- A pizza delivery man who
was taking an order to a house in East Texas
pulled out a gun and opened fire on two
would-be robbers, police said.
One of the alleged robbers was hospitalized
after getting shot in the back, Lufkin
police said. The Papa John’s pizza delivery
man, who’s licensed to carry a handgun,
wasn’t hurt.
The shooting was Tuesday night, after the
delivery man walked up to a house and rang a
doorbell, Lufkin police said. It turned out
the house was vacant and two armed men
approached him from the side of the house,
The Lufkin Daily News reported Thursday. The
delivery man drew a .22 caliber Derringer
and fired two shots, and the assailants ran
away, police said.
It appears unlikely the delivery man will
face any charges since he “was defending
himself at the time of the shooting,” Lufkin
Police Lt. David Young said.
A call placed to the restaurant and a call
to the chain’s corporate headquarters in
Louisville, Ky., weren’t immediately
returned Thursday.
Police said Johnx R. Greer, 18, was arrested
at a hospital where he was treated for a
gunshot wound to the back. He’s been charged
with aggravated robbery and was being held
in the Angelina County Jail on a $100,000
bond. His attorney, John Tunnell, did not
return a call Thursday.
The other suspect hasn’t been found.
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Suzanna Gratia Hupp
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CCRKBA
HAILS
INTERIOR
DEPT.
RULING
ON
CONCEALED
CARRY
IN
NATIONAL
PARKS
BELLEVUE, WA –
Today’s announcement
that the Interior
Department has
amended its rules
and will henceforth
allow licensed
concealed carry in
national parks was
hailed as a victory
for the Second
Amendment by the
Citizens Committee
for the Right to
Keep and Bear Arms.
“No longer will
American citizens be
required to leave
their right of
self-defense at the
gates of a national
park,” said CCRKBA
Chairman Alan
Gottlieb. “This
common-sense change
in regulations
reflects not only
changes in the laws
of 48 states, but
more importantly the
Supreme Court’s
ruling in June that
upheld the
individual right to
keep and bear arms
that is protected by
the Second
Amendment.”
Under the rule
change, individuals
may carry concealed
handguns in national
parks and wildlife
refuges only if they
are licensed to
carry under the laws
of the state in
which the park or
refuge is located.
This new rule does
not allow the
illegal carrying of
any firearm, nor
will it allow
hunting, target
practice or
poaching.
“We are delighted
that the Interior
Department has taken
this step,” Gottlieb
stated. “This was
never an issue of
opening parks to
hunting or
recreational
shooting, and the
extremist opponents
of this measure know
it. This has always
been about personal
protection in areas
where law
enforcement may be
hours away, or not
available at all, in
an emergency.
“As with the
adoption of
concealed carry laws
in dozens of states
over the past
several years,” he
added, “we are
confident that
passage of time will
prove that all the
alarmist rhetoric
about poaching and
increase danger to
families and
especially children
was deliberately
misleading.
“With the nation
facing drastic
budget cuts,”
Gottlieb said, “this
rule change comes at
the right moment. It
recognizes the
inability of park
officials to provide
adequate law
enforcement
services,
particularly in the
back country. We are
confident that
passage of time will
prove that this rule
change, like the
adoption of sensible
concealed carry laws
in dozens of states
over the past 20
years, improves
public safety and
deters criminal
behavior.”
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Techniques
that Threat Solutions Staff have put to the
test.
Should I Transition or Emergency Reload?
by Eric Dean
During a recent range event, Loren and I
took the opportunity to put an age old
question to the test. That test is either
reload if ,heaven forbid, my primary weapon
were to run out of ammo or to transition to
my secondary if the gods were to grace me
with one.
First off, Loren and I stood at the 25 meter
line both with 5.56 carbines and the awesome
Beretta 92F/S in hand. (Don't hold it
againts us, we were training our nations
finest) At the other end of the range stood
three normal, regulation sized ABA
sanctioned bowling pins. The drill consisted
of us both were to simulate that we ran out
of ammo. Next I was to transition to my
secondary and Loren was to execute an
"emergency reload" after the buzzer went off
and the drill began. Loren and I are well
might I say not the best shots in the world,
but we can handle ourselves okay. I am
working with him and he is showing signs of
improvement. (Sorry Loren had to stick that
one in there.) I am expecting a phone call
any moment from him. Wait is that the phone?
Okay, the buzzer sounds and the drill begins
with Loren performing an emergency reload
and I a transition. I am able to get the
transition off obviously quicker then my
counterpart (no one would argue that point)
and I began to engage the targets. My first
two shots rang out quickly and to my
surprise, nothing fell. I slowed a bit,
fired a third and still nothing. Now Loren
nearly has completed his reload, so I began
speeding my shots up and even though I would
have been landing solid shots near the
"tombstone" (Riposte-1 target from LE
Targets) the bowling pins remained standing
so therefore no "stop" shots were assumed.
At this point Loren completed the reload and
began to knock the pins down in order, 1, 2,
3. To make it official, we switched roles, I
reloaded and Loren transitioned much to the
same result as the first. The transition can
not get effective shots off at that range.
So, now that at 25 meters it is safe to
assume that your best bet is to reload that
empty weapon (hopefully from cover) and get
back into the fight. Unless your along the
lines of say Jim Higgenbotham, keep that
primary weapon going.
Next we jumped up to the 15 meter line and
performed the same drill. Now this time, the
transition was able to get the pins down 1
to the reloads 2. So its safe to assume that
at this range of 15 meters to 25 meters
seems safe to stay with the primary. Now
remember that someone is shooting at you,
and you really need to stay dynamic. Its a
bit difficult to reload effectively on a
knee in the open with someone shooting at
you so close you can read the fine print on
their hat.
Finally at the 10 meter line. Man what a
change. The transition was super fast. The
transition knocked down all three pins, made
coffee and had the Beretta cleaned before
the reload could yell, "primary down!".
So what is the morale of the story you ask?
10-12 meters to target or closer, or you
need to put bullets at a target from a bit
further away without really hitting stopping
shots? Transition my friend. Need to stop a
target effectively from 15 meters on out?
Get that carbine talking quickly!
-Eric
September 29, 2007
Leave your comments and thoughts here.
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Operations or Conditions Check
by Eric Dean
What about an operations check (or
conditions check in some circles) with a
pistol? At the range a couple of years ago I
came up with this type of operations check
when using a pistol. This technique I have
been teaching the day that it dawned on me.
When I was engaging a target with my
secondary weapon I thought about the
operations check executing it by basically
bringing the weapon into a modified "third
eye" and rotating the weapon skyward briefly
before bringing it back to the scan and
executing a reload or returning the weapon
to retention. There is nothing wrong with
this technique as far as I am concerned.
There are a few things that may not be what
one wants to do but they are small. For one,
if your performing a operations check then
most likely the situation has de-escalated
to a point to which you think that it is
safe to do so, so pulling the weapon down
out of the "shooter's box" is not a horribly
bad thing as long as nothing was to pop up
and see what all the hub-bub was about.
People's attention tends to be drawn to loud
noises. Secondly shooting from the third eye
is not the most stable platform from which
to shoot. The Threat Solutions method is
simple and I think it enables the shooter to
perform an operations check while
eliminating these little problems.
Now to execute The Threat Solutions
Operations Check one simple executes one
simple motion while the weapon is at the
scan position. While you are looking over
the sights instead of putting the weapon
into a third eye retention position then
performing an operations check, try just
looking at the juncture of the upper slide
and the lower assembly and make sure that
the seam is together and the weapon is in
full battery, ready to fire. This will tell
you if the weapon is out of battery, if
there is a "stove pipe" or the weapon is out
of operation. If any of these conditions are
observed then getting the weapon back into
service can be done while keeping the weapon
in the shooters box while the weapon is
still at the scan and at its most stable. So
once again, while in the scan phase, simple
take your eyes off the sights and look at
the back of your AUTOMATIC weapon and ensure
that the weapon is in battery and ready to
fire again, top off the weapon and get
going!
-Eric
Leave your comments and thoughts here.Leave
your comments and thoughts here.
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
"These comments are
the expressed opinions of the authors of the
articles. We at
Threat Solutions are not responsible for a
reader of these articles to deem these
articles as the truth or the only way to
perform a task. All of these thoughts are
open for debate and We welcome them. No one
can get better in this field without it.
This field requires an enormous amount of in
depth training to understand the
fundamentals required to make quick
decisions in a gun fight. We tell everyone
to search out for more knowledge and by no
means think that there is a one-stop gun
fighting technique school. If you use one of these
techniques and it doesn't work, you most
likely missed the point we were trying to
make, you did not practice enough, or you
did it wrong." |